In a growingly interconnected and globalized world, it is important to incorporate an international and global scope into the classroom study of philanthropy and nonprofits. This is especially important for students in U.S. based classrooms given the extent of international giving ($23 billion annually), the significant ties of domestic nonprofits with global actors, and the history of government relations and foreign aid around the globe (Giving USA, 2018). This international sector of the philanthropic and nonprofit field plays a significant role in the operations of foundations, nonprofits, governments, and community organizations both domestically and globally. Preparing students to understand the processes, paradigms, actors, and history of international philanthropy and nonprofits is an important educational task. This eight-session unit is designed to meet this need by incorporating an explicit focus on international philanthropy and nonprofits into an introductory nonprofits course. It is expected that students in the course would have previously been exposed to key ideas of what constitutes a nonprofit and the role of these organizations and philanthropy more broadly in society. While an entire course could be taught on international philanthropy and nonprofits, since this is a single unit within a larger course, it is designed to offer an introduction to the topic for students. In preparing this unit, I began with reflections on an effective design approach to use (you can read more on my design approach here). I then considered my own pedagogical philosophies that are central to my teaching practices and how these philosophies would inform the design of this unit. I then considered the teaching practices I aim to incorporate into my classrooms and how these practices align with and support my philosophies and student learning. With this theoretical foundation in place, I have designed a unit on international philanthropy and nonprofits that aims to promote critical thinking, expand student perceptions, and expose students to the diversity of perspectives in the field.
Students should read the following to inform discussions:
Warm Up: True or False? Global Inequality (10 minutes)
Adapted from: World’s Largest Lesson. (2016). “The World is not Equal. Is that Fair?” UNICEF. http://cdn.worldslargestlesson.globalgoals.org/2016/05/The-World-Is-Not-Equal.-Is-That-Fair.pdf
The purpose of this activity is to introduce students to different forms of inequality on a global scale. Instruct students to bring an electronic device to class (phone, tablet, computer). Note, you may also conduct this activity in paper format if access to technology will be a hindrance to student participation.
Where do you stand? Exploring the gap between the rich and the poor (10 minutes)
Adapted from: Oxfam Education GB, (ND) “Global Poverty Learning Day” https://www.oxfam.org.uk/education/resources/global-poverty-learning-day
The purpose of this activity is for students to further explore the gap between the rich and the poor on a global scale. They will consider the implications of this gap and the disparity of resource access and related inequity.
Debrief Questions:
Interrogating Terminology:Gallery Walk (30 minutes)
The purpose of this activity is for students to explore common terms employed in international philanthropy and nonprofit work and to interrogate the connotations and assumptions related to those terms. Students will learn the significance of language use and its implications and begin to explore the concepts of dominant narratives and their impacts on worldviews.
Students should complete the Associations worksheet (Appendix C) prior to class and turn in. The instructor should review this worksheet to determine current knowledge and misconceptions. This will be returned to students as part of the next class sessions activity.
Read: Gollihu, K. (2016) “The History of Global Charitable Giving: Why we need to remember” which outlines the purpose and context of the History of Giving Website. LINK
Historyofgiving.org: Each student will be assigned one time period from History of Giving. They should read and take notes in detail on their section using the History Notes document (Appendix D).Students will work with peers assigned to the same section. As a small group, they will consolidate the information they learned and teach the material to their peers.
Small Group Work (25 minutes)
Small Group Presentations (3-5 minutes each)
Bringing it together (5-10 minutes)
Small Group Work: Prior to class, the instructor should plan to form students in groups of roughly 5 with attention to group dynamics that support inclusion. These groups will form the basis of today's session. When students arrive have them sit with their small groups.
Post Viewing Roundup: (10 Minutes)
Students should watch Poverty Inc. before arriving to class. Participation in this activity can be reinforced by having students turn in Viewing Notes and an updated Assumptions worksheet they completed for the first day of the unit. Instruct students that this will impact their grade as it is important for all students to be prepared to engage with their small groups.
Mind Maps: Introduce the Concept (10 minutes)
Explain to the students that they will be working in small groups to develop Mind Maps outlining the systems and impacts they learned about in the film as it relates to global poverty. Explain to students the purpose of Mind Maps and how they are created.
Show this short clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5Y4pIsXTV0
Small Group Mind Map Creation: (30 minutes)
Students should read the following material before class. They should come to class with 2 discussion questions that either focus on one specific reading or look at themes across the readings. They should also identify one quote from the text that sums up the main theme or argument of that text. This prep work will be used to structure the class discussion.
Students should read: World Health Organization “Stakeholder Analysis ToolKit”
Group Quiz (10 minutes)
Begin the class by a group quiz to check reading comprehension. Sort students into small groups and let them know they can reference the reading material as needed. Ask students a series of factual information and keep score. Consider increasing participation by offering a reward for the group that answers the most questions correct the fastest (candy, etc.).
Warm Up Discussion (5 minutes)
Once the class has shown mastery over the basic elements of a Stakeholder Analysis have students gather in small groups. Prompt the students to discuss the perspective of the toolkit they read. The goal in this discussion is to have students consider the fact that the methods and ways that a Stakeholder Analysis is discussed and planned are part of the larger systems discussed in the unit. Importantly students should always be interrogating the assumptions of a reading, and the possible impacts assumptions and power has on communities. Students should discuss what it means to be using a World Health Organization report. Note that part of the lesson is to understand stakeholder analysis, but another part is for students to learn how to interpret the meaning and experience the process utilized by large international philanthropy and nonprofit institutions (such as the WHO).
Stakeholder Mapping (5 minutes)
Review for students a Stakeholder Relationship Map and a Stakeholder Interest & Power Matrix. They will need to know how to complete these for the class activity.
Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis (30 minutes)Students should have each completed a review of an International Organization for homework. Have students share a bit about their organization and for each group to select one organization to dive into deeper.
Each student should complete an Interest and Power Matrix for the organization that their group chose in the class session. They should map the stakeholders in the Matrix as discussed in class. They should submit a short rationale for why they chose to place key stakeholders in different areas of the Matrix.
In this session, students will follow an amended version of the Good Fortune Lesson Plan developed through the PBS Point of View program (http://archive.pov.org/goodfortune/lesson-plan/). Lesson Outline: From PBS Point of View
Students will analyze a video case study of a development project in Kenya and evaluate:
1. Begin by explaining that over the past 50 years, the West has sent more than $2 trillion in aid to help alleviate poverty in Africa. Despite this, the continent continues to be plagued by poverty and instability. Today we will examine different approaches to international aid and development and begin to identify the most effective approaches and problematic errors.
2. Distribute the Viewing Guide (Appendix G) and show both video clips from the film “Good Fortune”. Students should respond to the viewing guide as they watch
3. After viewing, students should flip their Viewing Guide over and respond in writing to the question, “Do you think Dominion Farms will succeed in improving the living conditions of members of the local community?”. Students should explain why/why not.
4. Evaluating Responses and Argument: Divide students into 5 groups. Assign each group an interview to read outlining different responses to the film, Good Fortune (LINK). As a group, students should read the article and answer the following questions in writing on large display sheets. They will summarize the short article they read and share this with the class as well as responses to the following:
5. Show the class the Strides in Development video that features Nobel Prize-winning author Amartya Sen. Discuss which factors Sen believes are essential for effective development efforts. Discuss also how the approach of FXB International, discussed in this video, compares to the efforts of Dominion Farms in Kenya’s Yala Swamp area?
Identify an international development project that you are familiar with. Evaluate the degree to which community development efforts are responding to local needs and the extent they reflect the success factors described by the experts studied in class. Have students identify a project, find out how and why it got started and determine whether those the project serves have been involved in its planning and implementation. Students should write letters to the editor that praise or criticize how receptive the project has been to local input.
Warm Up (10 minutes)
Show selected photos from the Barbie Savior account that students submitted.
After each photo ask students to discuss in pairs discuss their reactions to the photo and to explain what the photo is criticizing. Keep a running list of the processes, perspectives, and ideas that students identify in the photo.
Collaboration Annotation (40 minutes)
Students will be assigned to work in small groups. These may be the same groups you use throughout the semester or can be mixed up. Students will participate in a collaboration annotation of the two texts read for today’s class with the goal of engaging, analyzing and critically interpreting texts See Dean & Schulten (2015) for details on classroom annotation practices and learning.
Each group will have access to a Google Doc with the two articles included. To ease discussion, the instructor should divide each article up into at least as many passages as students per group.
Based on your collaborative annotation and class discussions, submit a 1-page reflection on the White Savior Industrial Complex. What is the complex, and how can someone who is interested in “helping” others, avoid its pitfalls?
Students will each share a 2-minute timed presentation summarizing their key takeaways from the unit. Students are encouraged to be creative in their presentations and approach to this assignment. Scaffolding earlier in the semester will help students build the skills to be successful in this assignment. Students should be provided with the following prompts. Students are not expected to respond to each prompt but instead should use one or more to inspire their presentation. The goal is for students to showcase their learning but also to learn from each other’s perspectives. See Appendix Ifor the student instruction sheet and prompts.
As students listen to each other's presentations, instruct them to keep a running sheet where they write down one quick take away from each presentation. This can be done while the next student is preparing to share.